Everything I publish carries numbers, and some of them have been wrong. This is the log: what was stated, what it should have said, and where it was fixed.
It exists because a claim you cannot check is worth very little, and a track record of corrections is the only evidence that the checking is real.
- Stated the cross-organisation correlation gain as 4.4x.The correct figure is 2.9x (35.1% against 12.2%). The 4.4x came from an earlier evaluation run and survived into the docs after the numbers settled. Fixed in the repository.
- Stated the digest size advantage over a quantised embedding as roughly 10x.The correct ratio is roughly 12x — 384 bytes against 32. Fixed in the repository.